The challenge
An issue report described an inference failure with little information about its cause. The execution path crossed the application, runtime, application driver, Linux kernel, and hardware, making the source of the failure unclear.
Building the evidence
I worked with the reporter to obtain reproduction steps and reproduced the failure on a development board. I examined kernel logs and hardware error events, then consulted the relevant documentation to understand what the failure indicated.
Following the execution path
My initial suspicion about the failing component did not resolve the issue. I built and investigated the components along the execution path, including code outside my team’s direct ownership. By isolating read and write operations and varying the transfer size, I narrowed the failure to a hardware-access operation in the driver path.
The outcome
I resolved the failure by changing the access pattern to respect the hardware’s supported transaction size. The investigation reinforced the value of a reproducible test case, controlled experiments, and revisiting an initial hypothesis when the evidence points elsewhere.